![]() ![]() ![]() It’s a textbook critique of traditional masculinity, and her rhetorical fluorish empowers most of her thinking. The way she frames men as psychological victims of patriarchy is important, as is her examination of the subsequent violation and erosion of men’s interior emotional lives in an attempt to conform to a masculine ideal. I generally sympathize and agree with most of bell hooks’ thinking in this. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |